Skip to main content

The search for an Unified Online Identity

This is a post after a long while. Too busy. Too lazy. Both. Take your pick. The recent announcement of the new avatar of the messaging system at Facebook takes me back to the first post of this blog, talking about Facebook Email. Nearly three years since, Facebook did do its own take on email. Only they try to take aggregation in a larger way. I am still awaiting an invite to it, and will post more reactions when I get to see it.  But Facebook blog post has an interesting point to make. Will we be known by who we are or by a number (UID notwithstanding)? or even better, an xml file, the schema could be like the following.
<?xml version="1.0"?>
<xs:schema xmlns:xs="">
<xs:element name="Public identity">
      <xs:element name="Name" type="xs:string"/>
      <xs:element name="Website" type="xs:string"/>
      <xs:element name="Blog" type="xs:string"/>
<xs:element name="Colleague identity">
      <xs:element name="Number" type="xs:number"/>
      <xs:element name="Office Address" type="xs:string"/>
<xs:element name="Friend identity">
      <xs:element name="Home Number" type="xs:number"/>
      <xs:element name="Home Address" type="xs:string"/>
The Luddite in me says that Life will and should go on the way it has (UID or XML apart). These days go to any site that requires registration and you get a an array of options to authenticate. OpenID, Google, Facebook, Live...  Does Facebook (and associated corporations) have the right to create identity. Do we envision a time that our access to our bank account is tied to our Facebook account. I shudder to think what happens if your account gets hacked, what all could you lose. What if you were Julian Assange and displeased the US Government or you ran a site which aggregated links to your favourite sports stories and ended up displeasing the US customs department.  Not to mention, “he insulted my <insert-name-of-a-parochial-figure> type complaints that routinely hit police stations in India. Account suspended and bye bye everything. The fascist amongst you might think, the state knows best. But come on. Drive a bike in Delhi long enough and you know the brutal the agents of the state can be.   Consitutional Protections What protections could such an identity have. What if the government gets tired of you and decides to revoke your id, (like passports). You have nothing. Such an identity will probably need to be protected as one of the fundamental rights in the constitution. Because short of that it’s fair game. 

What of Anonymity
If an online identity becomes de rigueur what of anonymity. I can’t be an armchair picketeer on Facebook or Twitter (a la Egypt) without risking revealing myself. There is something to being there in the physical sense.

Interesting days ahead.


Popular posts from this blog

Social Networking for Grown-Ups...

So much is said about social networks and how catch all social networks are all the rage right now. But look back a few years and you see all a landscape littered with yesterday's stars.
and to some extent
Orkut (Some may argue that Orkut is alive and kicking in India, but I beg to differ. Orkut isn't hip any mre, which means that over time it will slide into nothingness. After all which woman, wants 100 friend requests from absolute strangers)

And not to mention that the hundreds of new social networks that pop up every other day. Clearly a gold rush is on. The acquisition of Desimartini by HT 's Firefly eVenture is a symptom of this gold rush.
With the reported difficulties of Google & MS to monetise their respective ad properties of MySpace and Facebook, it is clear that we have seen all the hypergrowth we had to see, It will grow, there are after all several billion people on this planet but not necessarily to the point, where it will justify …

Wikipedia and News

As the 63rd Republic Day celebrations wound down. I happened to be on the Wikipedia page on the topic (Wikipedia Republic Day (India)) and started fixing some presentation issues regarding the references used.

I noticed something. News articles seem to have been sourced from Wikipedia. No big deal, blame it on a lazy journalist etc.

Here is where it started getting stranger. The wikipedia article started referencing the story that was sourced from wikipedia. In effect it was self referencing itself.

In this particular case, it was the list of Chief Guests at the Republic day parade. The older reference were links to MEA etc. which progressively started changing into references to news stories done in the recent past.

So, is wikipedia shaping the way we are being fed news? Sure, that is clearly the case.
Further, is wikipedia reinforcing the biases and errors that may have been crept in (as is expected in a crowdsourced article)?