Skip to main content

Why FlipKart will make the cut

Did you read today's article in TOI on Flipkart's funding round by Samidha? Amazed? shaking your head? Wondering about that story in Forbes?

While I can't comment on the valuation with any authority. It seems rich to me, maybe investors see value being created over time. I can comment on why Flipkart has made it as a brand. not because of the huge media spends, but an altogether different reason.

Here is why Flipkart will survive the current race amongst the ecommerce startups (including the newly arrived "German Brigade").

But first, two instances I want to illustrate, why.

  •  Madhu Menon, who I follow on Twitter, a few weeks ago, made a comment (prompted by my recommendation of Homeshop18), which was on the lines of the following (I am paraphrasing).
For the difference of only Rs. 200 extra, I would much rather go with Flipkart for the mixer-grinder than another provider.
This is not an isolated incident, I have read many such tweets, especially those that value speed of delivery over better prices.

  • Earlier today, I was at Department of Management Studies at IITD, where I was giving a short talk on branding of e-commerce. During the talk I asked a direct question to the student body.
"How many of you buy a book on FlipKart, knowing full well that it may be available cheaper elsewhere on the web." about 10% of the student body nodded the affirmative (some very vigourously).

Two different types of customers and a similar reaction in a section of them. The point of these obeservations is, a statement I made in a previous post about watches:

"The first and only reason for a brand to exist is to create a positive preference towards your brand which allows you to extract better margins over the garden variety of the same product. That’s it. Nothing else."
Make the connection?

Is it all smooth sailing then?

Not quite. While there is this premium people are willing to pay for being associated with a brand. You could call this premium the price of trust. That trust could easily be broken by not keeping to the original promise. Which was "lower prices".

Increasingly Flipkart is no longer the price leader in the primary category it operates in i.e.: Books. In electronics (where margins are thin as it is), you may actually get a better deal from a physical store (imagine the irony). I got a great deal from Croma in Delhi on a new Panasonic plasma TV that I bought October: an eye-popping 63% off the MRP (admittedly, it was a group buy of 25 TV's but even then, quite a deal).

And let's not forget the impending launch of Amazon.com. The global giant is by all acounts on the verge of announcing their launch in India.

Walmart and Amazon are, what they are, because they live to that promise of providing the best value every day. Flipkart just needs to stick to the knitting.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Draft Response to TRAI in support of differential pricing for Data services

This is a draft response to TRAI on their consultation paper on Differential Pricing for Data Services. Please feel free to comment, suggest improvements and most importantly use in part or in whole to send in your comments in support of Differential Pricing for Data Services. (Structure borrowed from the STI campaign)
Emails should be sent to advisorfea1@trai.gov.in
Dear Sir,

Thank you for this Consultation Paper on Differential Pricing for Data Services; The TRAI should bring in rules that foster innovation not just in the Internet services Domain, but also in the domain of Internet access. This will invariably mean to allow a free hand to TSPs to innovate in distribution and pricing. This would include differential pricing - especially the practice of “Zero Rating” and other such innovations.
I hope the TRAI considers my answers.
Thanking you
My answers: Question 1: Should the TSPs be allowed to have differential pricing for data usage for accessing different websites, applications or pla…

The Return of the Mobile browser

We all love to make predictions and I made one to @shachinb and Steffen Harting when I met them in early 2014. 
Which was: Apps are  temporary phase (of indeterminate length), eventually most apps will switch back into the web browser. Only games and apps that require continuous access to phone sensors such as accelerometer,  GPS etc will remain as apps. For most other purposes a well designed mobile website is going to do a world of good.
So, when Forbes declared that  the mobile browser is dead and the mobile app is the new new thing, I retested my earlier hypothesis and came to the same conclusion. I.e. We are hung up on apps way more than required
Due to this hang up, we are sacrificing the mobile web experience. It pleased me no end to see an old friend @jassim make this comment Super impressed with the Twitter mobile web experience, replaces the app for me This just goes to show it is possible to achieve what I stated as a hypothesis above. One look at the NDTV mobile websit…

Packaging as a service

Last Wednesday I was at the ASSOCHAM Packaging Summit 2012 giving a talk on the new opportunities for the packaging industry.

Very wisely (as I would discover at the event), at the outset, I decided to eschew the usual Packaging related topics. i.e. innovation, new trends, numbers, stats etc.

Instead, I talked about how the Packaging Industry could look beyond the traditional confines of rigid, flexible packaging etc. and look at their business as a service.

If you rewind a little over a hundred years or so, you will see the example of Levi's. Levi's made his fortune during the original California gold rush supplying riveted jeans.

And then fast-forward a hundred years from there, you have Bill Gates, who made his fortune by providing tools for the information age. As you would have guessed from the title, the analogy I drew was that in any gold rush, people who provide infrastructure (Amazon/Microsoft Cloud anyone?) are the ones most likely to walk away with the prize,

Whi…